The Iron Gauntlet

- Frank - 25 - Bronx, New York -
Just trying to figure out what's next for me. I have a really good life honestly, I just wish I had some idea about who I'm supposed to be. On this blog you will see plenty of the following:

[X] Personal thoughts concerning my life
[X] Left-leaning political ideas
[X] Science and technology
[X] Lots of anti-religious sentiments
[X] Atheistic quotations and ideas
[X] Pro-humanism / pro-secularism
[X] Philosophy and psychology
[X] Pro-choice / pro-gay rights
[X] Disdain for cultural pride and nationalism
[X] Humor that might offend you
[X] Fantasy and science fiction things
[X] Medieval themed artwork
[X] A Song of Ice and Fire
[X] Game of Thrones
[X] Dragon Age
[X] Star Wars (original trilogy)
[X] The Walking Dead
[X] Lord of the Rings
[X] Mass Effect
[X] World War II inspired posts
[X] Mythology and ancient history
[X] Plenty of Christopher Hitchens
[X] Lots of Dawkins and Sam Harris
[X] Lots of animals (birds,cats,deer,reptiles,etc.)
[X] Face Off on the Syfy Channel
[X] The night sky, moon, and stars
[X] New York Rangers Hockey
[X] Stand-up Comedy
[X] Posts that are overall funny

Moon of My Life

The Inner Machinations of My Mind

This handsome son of a bitch :)
Posts I Like
Posts tagged "catholic"
Yep. 

Yep. 

stfuconservatives:

Because laws that limit people’s reproductive choices are only good things when it *doesn’t* cost you money, apparently. The Catholic hospital’s lawyers are arguing that, since the unborn are not people with legal rights under Colorado law, they are not liable for their deaths (the case is a wrongful death suit for the mother, who was 7 months along with twins). And they are correct. A fetus does not have the same rights as a born human being. But Catholics, come on. Either you ideologically believe fetuses are people, or they aren’t. You don’t get to decide which is which when it suits your fancy. Pick one.

Bahahahaha, pro-life so long as it doesn’t cost you money?

(via feistyfeminist)

LOL, very nice. 

(via atheist-overdose)

After Illinois began allowing civil unions last year, the Catholic Charities groups in the state (which handled foster children) were worried that they would have to put kids in the homes of gay or lesbian couples (oh, the horror!). But since they received taxpayer money for their work, they had no right to discriminate. So instead of doing the right thing for the children, they opted to shut down altogether.

LOL, I absolutely love how Catholic charities would sooner disband rather than offer money to foster children living in the homes of homosexual couples. I would call that the opposite of morality, and I firmly doubt that any secular charities would ever wish to discriminate on such a basis. 

(via questionall)

LMAO, wow… I mean, okay. If you can find a way around one of your savior’s core messages like that… sure. LOL, what fucking assholes. I can’t. hahaha

(via atheist-overdose)

blogvader:

Ireland’s Justice Minister Alan Shatter is planning to introduce legislation later this year that would put people in jail for 10 years if they withheld information that would help prosecute a child abuser.

Conformity to religious dogma is more important than protecting children and exposing sexual predators in the Catholic Church.

Outstanding.

This is unsurprising. 

I enjoy Tim Minchin. 

(via godless-apostate)

atheistoverdose:

Mike Birbiglia slipped this one in on me just a minute ago.

Lmao, never heard of this guy before today. He’s funny.

(via godless-apostate)

bebinn:

sarahlee310:

A judge ruled Friday that the Catholic church can’t impose restrictions on abortion and contraception services for human trafficking victims served with taxpayer dollars.

We’ve gotten to the point where legislation and rulings that should be common sense are now being framed as victories. Yippee.

Seriously. I almost find it difficult to even be happy about these victories anymore. These shouldn’t even be controversial issues. Fuck the catholic church and everything it stands for. I grow so tired of the constant bullshit every fucking day.

(via stiffcrosscurrents)

Just sayin’.

Just sayin’.

religiousragings:

Quite silly if you ask me, too.  And this kind of explains maybe what it does, but not exactly what it is.  It sounds like being baptised causes one to be possessed by some kind of god-demon that causes you to spout incoherent bullshit and perform all kinds of ritualistic sit-down, stand-up dances during Catholic church services. 

And what does it mean to blaspheme against the holy spirit?  If I say of Rick Santorum, for example, that his holy spirit, if he has one, must be seriously fucked up, is that a blaspheme?

~ Steve

This made me laugh. lol

(via skepticalavenger)

I know I’m gonna get shit for it from my family when the time comes, but I’m not getting my kids baptized. I don’t see the purpose. I don’t believe, and I doubt very much that I’m going to fall madly in love with a very religious girl, so it really shouldn’t be an issue. However, I always wonder about what my family will actually think/say. Furthermore, I really wonder what my hypothetical in-laws would think/say.

I know I’m gonna get shit for it from my family when the time comes, but I’m not getting my kids baptized. I don’t see the purpose. I don’t believe, and I doubt very much that I’m going to fall madly in love with a very religious girl, so it really shouldn’t be an issue. However, I always wonder about what my family will actually think/say. Furthermore, I really wonder what my hypothetical in-laws would think/say.

Read this article.

Read it and then fucking tell me that Christianity is a “force for good.”

When discussing religion with friends/family, I try to follow these basic rules:

  1. I never bring it up on my own; if the issue is brought up, I will give my opinion, but I will never simply start a religious debate or discussion because I know how touchy people are when it comes to their god
  2. I try to remain objective and civil; I never get personal or try to offend, however I feel that people often get offended anyway
  3. Oftentimes I will simply try to get the other party to consider things that they previously had not; my true intention is to cause the parties involved to examine their own arguments and see if they can find valid points in mine

This evening, a discussion about the bible had begun brewing (much to my dismay), and I found myself in the position of not being able to hold back my opinion. I mentioned the fact that the bible is indeed filled with much hatred and is not exactly a “good” book (in the sense that you wouldn’t want to get your morality from it). Of course, being in a room full of people who grew up with Catholicism, either Italian or Irish, I was told that I was mistaken and that a lot of good comes from the bible. I asked for examples of such goodness but received none. Now, I wasn’t mad about any of this. I don’t get angry about it if it’s simply a discussion amongst friends, but I do feel as though I am looked at as some kind of radical who has no idea what he’s talking about. It’s honestly a little unfair in my eyes. I don’t wish to upset anyone, I’m only stating my opinion. No one is required to agree with me, but just remember that I am not simply going to back down from my position. I will not. I must remain true to my convictions.

My most honest of intentions is to get people to think about these issues. Seriously, what good comes from the bible? I know that there is definitely some goodness that comes from the bible, but does it outweigh all of the horror and torture? Does this goodness outweigh genocide and slavery? Does it outweigh the condemnation of homosexuality and freedom of thought? Most importantly, can you not learn great life lessons about morality from other sources? Is the bible really the best moral compass you can come up with? 

I don’t expect to sway everyone, I just hope that the people I care about won’t look at me as if I’m simply wrong. I know that many people have been inspired by the bible to do GREAT things that have made so many peoples’ lives better. But so many people have also used it to justify horrible cruelties and mass-atrocities:

  • You can say on one hand that the bible inspired some young people to start a non-profit organization that helps starving children all around the world. It’s a wonderful thing, isn’t it? But what if this organization begins to openly support anti-choice groups who support murdering abortion doctors? Then what? Is this group still a force for good? Would a secular group ever be caught dead supporting such horrible nonsense?
  • You might think that missionaries spreading the word of god is a good thing; they go to a war-torn country and give out bibles, and you can say that they give new meaning to the lives of people who had previously felt hopeless. There’s no harm in that, is there? But what happens when the local government starts adopting the bible teaching into its legal system? Is it still a force for good when they make a law that requires authorities to execute anyone accused of being a homosexual?
  • Taking a look at a local community; its streets and overall infrastructure are in disrepair, much of the youth is involved in gang violence, and local businesses are suffering. The priest in the one church in town is holding the community together, helping people find work, trying to get the kids off the streets, and doing charity work all over town. Even I would say that this is a wonderful force for good, but what if that priest had come from another parish that kicked him out because of “inappropriate behavior with children”? What if he is using the weak position of some of the troubled youngsters to exploit them? Is he a good man for helping the community, or is he a monster who preys on children?

These are just a few examples. They might seem extreme, but they are not unrealistic or far-fetched. They have all happened and will happen again. Like I said, I know there is good and bad in everything; I just happen to think that the bible has more bad than good.

abaldwin360:

When someone says debating religion is pointless because they’ll never change their minds…

Here are the first five videos in the debate.

and, here is the thread about it on reddit.

An amazing debate, I loved it so much. The looks on Hitchens’ and Fry’s faces once they saw how many people they swayed. I was so happy to see that open-minded people still exist in this world.