The Iron Gauntlet

- Frank - 25 - Bronx, New York -
Just trying to figure out what's next for me. I have a really good life honestly, I just wish I had some idea about who I'm supposed to be. On this blog you will see plenty of the following:

[X] Personal thoughts concerning my life
[X] Left-leaning political ideas
[X] Science and technology
[X] Lots of anti-religious sentiments
[X] Atheistic quotations and ideas
[X] Pro-humanism / pro-secularism
[X] Philosophy and psychology
[X] Pro-choice / pro-gay rights
[X] Disdain for cultural pride and nationalism
[X] Humor that might offend you
[X] Fantasy and science fiction things
[X] Medieval themed artwork
[X] A Song of Ice and Fire
[X] Game of Thrones
[X] Dragon Age
[X] Star Wars (original trilogy)
[X] The Walking Dead
[X] Lord of the Rings
[X] Mass Effect
[X] World War II inspired posts
[X] Mythology and ancient history
[X] Plenty of Christopher Hitchens
[X] Lots of Dawkins and Sam Harris
[X] Lots of animals (birds,cats,deer,reptiles,etc.)
[X] Face Off on the Syfy Channel
[X] The night sky, moon, and stars
[X] New York Rangers Hockey
[X] Stand-up Comedy
[X] Posts that are overall funny

Moon of My Life

The Inner Machinations of My Mind

This handsome son of a bitch :)
Posts I Like
Posts tagged "birth control"

convergentprofundity:

convergentprofundity:

ragingbeard:

yourpsychoticex:

calledtoblog784743945:tackyawn:eco-before-ego:

The Best Birth Control In The World Is For Men by Jon Clinkenbeard

If I were going to describe the perfect contraceptive, it would go something like this: no babies, no latex, no daily pill to remember, no hormones to interfere with mood or sex drive, no negative health effects whatsoever, and 100 percent effectiveness. The funny thing is, something like that currently exists.

The procedure called RISUG in India (reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance) takes about 15 minutes with a doctor, is effective after about three days, and lasts for 10 or more years…

Oh, and when you do decide you want those babies, it only takes one other injection of water and baking soda to flush out the gel, and within two to three months, you’ve got all your healthy sperm again.

The trouble is, most people don’t even know this exists. And if men only need one super-cheap shot every 10 years or more, that’s not something that gets big pharmaceutical companies all fired up, because they’ll make zero money on it (even if it might have the side benefit of, you know, destroying HIV).

Is this shit for real?

If this is real, I can’t see why most guys my age wouldn’t do it.

I don’t think it would destroy HIV… fluids are still being exchanged.

Thought it seemed too good to be true… this is from the wiki:

The thoroughness of carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, and toxicity testing in clinical trials has been questioned. In October 2002, India’s Ministry of Health aborted the clinical trials due to reports of albumin in urine and scrotal swelling in Phase III trial participants.[8] The Indian Council for Medical Research noted that dimethyl sulfoxide used as a solvent for the injection is known to cause kidney damage.[9]

Rats. Sorry everyone. Reblogging again for the last comment! ^

Paul Ryan is a fucking buffoon. But a dangerous buffoon nonetheless. 

(via zetarays)

drinkyourjuice:

Proceeds from the purchase of this shirt go to Planned Parenthood of the Heartland. Suck it Rush. Buy one here! - wickedclothes

This is amazing.

No joke, I kinda want one. lmao

(via cor7ana)

First, a bill that gives immunity to doctors who lie to couples about the results of their prenatal tests in order to prevent them from getting an abortion. Now, a bill that would give your boss the green light to fire you for using birth control. You think I am kidding? I wish. For a decade now, Arizona insurance companies have been required to provide coverage for contraception just like other prescriptions. But, because they saw an opening to score some political points, some politicians there are suddenly moving to take that coverage away from women and their families.

And we aren’t talking here just about exemptions for religiously affiliated employers like Catholic hospitals and universities. We are talking about authorizing secular, for-profit employers to deny a woman coverage for birth control if the employer doesn’t believe that she and her partner should be allowed to have sex without getting pregnant. Yup, that’s right. If the owner of the Taco Bell where you work opposes birth control, Arizona legislators want to give him a legal right to deny you insurance coverage for your pills.

Sadly, that isn’t even the half of it. You may want to sit down for this one. Arizona legislators know that whether or not her insurance covers it, a woman may get the prescription she needs to prevent an unintended pregnancy. They want to give her boss the right to control that too. The bill they are pushing would not only allow employers to take the insurance coverage away, but it would also make it easier for an employer who finds out that his employee uses birth control to fire her. You heard me right … to fire her. And I thought Rush Limbaugh’s comments were as low as you could go on this one.

This country is going to tear itself apart, piece by piece.

(via randomactsofchaos)

babydali:

religiousragings:

Vote Republican 2012

This would just encourage some of my relatives…

Same here ^. I know some people, some of them blood relatives, who actually agree with all of the psychotic bullshit that the republican party has been pushing for the last several years.

I can’t stand it anymore. All the religious and conservative nonsense that has no place in the year 2012… not to sound too cold, but once all of these old, hateful, bitter, racist, sexist fucks finally just die of old age, MAYBE THEN we’ll finally see some real progressive change.

Yes, I really feel this way.

(via picatso)

Rush Limbaugh is a fucking scumbag just like every other big-mouth conservative.

(via jazzandrajah)

Dear Catholics,

liberalsarecool:

The GOP are great at politicizing issues without accounting for facts. Or science. Or reality. Americans have sex. Lots of it. All the time.

How disturbingly out of touch, how invasive, how disastrous are your goals for controlling people, that, at the core of your opinions, you fail to acknowledge the private sex lives of millions of adult citizens?

They speak of contraception as if sex is a theory. “If” people have sex. “If” they were to get pregnant. How can you seriously deal with real life situations if you impose your “babies come from the stork” infantile intellect on very adult and diverse issues?

It’s not enough that republicans want to limit what they do in the bedroom. They want to limit what everyone else does in the bedroom. And you might ask yourself why they even care, or why your private/sex life is any of their business. 

There is only one thing they use to justify their trespass: religion

Disagree if you want, but you’d be wrong. Rick Santorum doesn’t hate condoms because he finds latex to be a deplorable material; he hates them because “god” told him that sex is ONLY FOR MARRIED HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES. And it is ONLY TO BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROCREATION. Going by his biblical standards, you’d have to redefine marriage pretty narrowly. In his eyes, the following couples should never get married:

  • homosexual couples
  • men who are infertile or have low sperm counts
  • women who are barren and can’t carry an infant to term
  • couples who do not want children
  • couples who have sex for pleasure in addition to procreation
  • couples who have sex for pleasure in general

None of these people would really be able to get married under a Santorum regime. And he justifies all of this nonsense with the bible. A book full of fairytales and violent nonsense that hasn’t been relevant for at least 1,000 years.

This is why religion is a poison.

(via sanityscraps)

iconog:

brilliantlyblindoptimist:

bhappy-bhealthy:

religiousragings:

No, you can’t deny women their basic rights and pretend it’s about your “religious freedom.”  If you don’t like birth control, don’t use it.  Religious freedom doesn’t mean you can force others to live by your own beliefs.  - Barack Obama

<3

Love, love, love this. 

for fucking real.

Well I’m glad he fucking said it. lol

(via raindropprincess)

cognitivedissonance:

I’ve decided I want to own a business just in case the GOP manages to pass their overbroad conscience bill. I have a moral objection to providing any kind of healthcare to a person who would strip it from others based on what a sky-god supposedly meant.

Yeah, I have that moral objection. But I would provide comprehensive health insurance anyhow. Why? Because it’s the right goddamn thing to do, even if I feel those folks should reap what they have sown for others.

If you have a moral objection to birth control, psychological treatment, etc. – don’t use that service. Don’t use contraception.

If you want to live by the Bible, hooray for you. Not all of us want that. Some of us don’t see an unintended pregnancy as a miracle. Some of us don’t think you can pray away depression.

No one is preventing you from attending church or practicing your faith. No one is stopping you from attempting to ram your version of Jesus Christ as a science-denying patriarch down my throat. All we ask is that you obey the laws passed years ago.

If a church wanted to violate child labor laws would politicians support an exception? After the start of the 2012 election cycle, I’m afraid to ask. We already allow churches to waive anti-discrimination laws and give them privileged tax status based upon their status as a church. If churches are going to lobby to control my body, the least they can do is acknowledge their organizational purpose is no longer shepherding a flock – it’s ringleading the political circus.

Until you render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, I argue churches pay taxes and follow the laws of any other political organization/business. There’s my moral objection – currently, they’re not. Assuming the GOP throws a successful tantrum on this issue, I will continue to make this moral objection.

I want to think the American people can see this conscience clause BS as a reactionary throwback, little more than circuses in a time of limited bread. But when the people elected to lead us are leading that circus parade of morality police instead, I fear my faith may be misplaced.

So in the future, come work for my law firm. I’ll provide comprehensive coverage for contraception and the like – even for those who change their minds and join the 98% of Catholics and 99% of Americans who admit to using contraception at least once. You won’t have to ask for it because it will already be there.

Why? Because it’s the ethical, moral thing to do.

This deserves way more notes.

seriouslyamerica:

sinidentidades:

Female Republican Senators go rogue, back Obama on contraceptives

Two female Republican members of the U.S. Senate, Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, have broken rank with their party and come out in favor of a new rule issued by the Obama Administration that requires private health insurers to fully pay for the cost of contraception products.

The two lawmakers extended their support after the administration tweaked its rule to exempt religious non-profits from paying any part of the cost for contraception.

“It appears that changes have been made that provide women’s health services without compelling Catholic organizations in particular to violate the beliefs and tenets of their faith,” Snowe said in a prepared statement. “According to the Catholic Health Association, the administration ‘responded to the issues [they] identified that needed to be fixed,’ which is what I urged the president to do in addressing this situation.”

Collins added that she was glad to see the administration had “finally listened to the concerns raised by many and appears to be seeking to avoid the threat to religious liberties posed by its original plan.”

Their support comes as Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) is shopping around an amendment to the rule that would allow any employer,  not just religious non-profits, to do away with workers’ contraception coverage. He was backed up by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who said Sunday that he supports taking the teeth out of the president’s rule by exempting any employer that wants out.

The rule initially required employers to pay in workplaces that cover the cost of health insurance for their employees, but it was strongly opposed by the Catholic Church, which considers contraceptive use to be a sin unless the user is a prostitute.

Oh, Snowe and Collins - every time I think your party is totally irredeemable, you go and say something sensible. [Also, I read the title and just KNEW it was these two.]

It’s good to see that some republicans have retained their sanity.

Also, Blunt and McConnell can go fuck themselves.

(via stfuconservatives)

If a woman chooses not to use birth control, or chooses not to have an abortion, that’s freedom.

If a man, whether a religious leader or a pandering politician, tells her what she’s able to do, that’s, well, it’s certainly not freedom.

These same religious leaders and politicians often talk about respecting women.

Respecting women isn’t telling them what to do “for their own good.” And hiding behind religion to deny contraceptive coverage is simply another way to perpetuate that abusive, illogical and antiquated notion.

Contraception and women’s rights — it’s still a man’s world - latimes.com (via katbeee)

*noting now that women are not the only ones affected by this issue.

(via stfuprolife)

(via no-rhythm)

sanityscraps:

thedailywhat:

Birth Control Compromise of the Day: Responding to the objections of religious groups, President Obama today announced an “accommodating” revision to the health care mandate that will allow women to receive free birth control irrespective of their employers’ personal conviction.

“[I]f a woman works for religious employers with objections to providing contraceptive services as part of its health plan,” the President said in his statement, ” the religious employer will not be required to provide contraception coverage, but her insurance company will be required to offer contraceptive care free of charge.”

Both the Catholic Health Association and NARAL Pro-Choice America approved of the compromise. The insurance industry has yet to issue a formal response, but White House officials reportedly consulted with insurers prior to the announcement. 

[reuters / mediaite / politico / photo: reuters.]

NNNOOOOOOOOO! I knew this compromise would be awful. Religious freedom does not include the right to deny people health care, especially not when it oppresses primarily women. Fuck you, GOP.

Obama caves on fucking everything. Fuck this stupid country.

“Religious freedom” doesn’t mean you get to tell other people what to do, even if they are your employees. This shit is ridiculous.

All you anti-choicers and “anti-contraception” people, PLEASE GO EXERCISE YOUR RIGHT TO MAKE CHOICES AND FUCKING KILL YOURSELVES.

Really, conservatives just hate women. They resent the fact that we work, go to school, vote, everything. Their entire stance on birth control, abortions and social programs is a thinly veiled attempt to take us back to a time when we had less rights. Take away our birth control and we get pregnant. Take away our abortions and we have to keep the baby (in their minds, anyway). Take away certain social programs to help support ourselves (mainly food stamps, WIC and housing assistance) and they think that will force us to get married to a man who can support us. Take away other social programs like daycare subsidies and then we have no choice but to stay at home and take care of the kids because the cost of daycare eats into any additional income. Men who have always relied on their male privilege to get them through life cannot handle seeing a women succeed, or even exist, without them. They figure if you keep kicking them back down, they’ll eventually give up and settle for some loser who doesn’t deserve them but has been given all the opportunities in the world to succeed because he possesses a penis.

hunnichild (via brienne—of—tarth)

inb4 someone changes this all to “uterus-bearers”

(via unknowablewoman)

(via no-i-in-threesome-deactivated20)